Share your ideas or create courses for the community.
Climate Change
Perspectives on climate challenges
Equality
Ideas advancing social equity and inclusion
Governance
Insights on ethical leadership
Steward Leadership
Leadership focused on long-term responsibility
Sustainability
Practices supporting environmental balance
Articles
Insights, perspectives, and thought leadership
Multimedia
Videos, podcasts, and visual storytelling
Courses
Interactive learning and skill development
Events
Conversations, webinars and community sessions
The People & Planet Prize
Celebrates powerful visual storytelling about your unique experiences with environmental and societal issues
Steward Leadership 25
Annual award that celebrates 25 solutions which demonstrate steward leadership excellence
Browse Content
Articles by Topic
Discussion
Share ideas and join community conversations
Networks
Projects and initiatives creating global change
Contributors
Meet the people behind the ideas
AWARDS & FELLOWSHIPS
Visual storytelling for environmental and societal impact
Annual award honoring 25 steward leadership solutions
Create post
Share an article with the community
Create event
Host a webinar or gathering
Create organisation
Set up an organisation profile
Apply for SL25
Submit a Steward Leadership application
Create course
Build a learning experience
Eunice Tay
Research and Insights Intern @ Stewardship Asia Centre
If we all simply considered the short—and long-term impact of our actions on the affected stakeholders to always output the most happiness or “good” into the world, wouldn't that be the best way to ensure a better society? This idea aligns with utilitarianism, the ethical theory that suggests actions are right if they result in the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.
In theory, utilitarianism is a good thing. It aims to maximise overall happiness, leading to better outcomes for everyone. However, it does not account for how we arrive at that outcome, which on an individual level, can lead to you becoming a happiness/utility pump, giving up your own enjoyment for that of other people. On a societal level, it can also lead to the justification of immoral actions such as abuse.
So how do we address this? An approach to consider is negative utilitarianism, a variant of it where preventing suffering is emphasised as the highest moral priority, which is then followed by maximising happiness. By shifting focus from solely maximizing overall happiness or utility, negative utilitarianism allows us to avoid an “ends justify the means,” mentality.
What if the principles of negative utilitarianism were applied not only to individual ethics but also to organizational practices? In a way, they already have been—through the concept of net-positivity. Net-positivity for businesses aims to go beyond CSR and net-zero, moving past just doing no harm to actively doing good.
The word “net-positive” is often associated with companies which create value from values. We often see case studies on companies that do so, such as Unilever, due to courageous leaders who step up to create positive change on an organizational scale, making an impact not just on their own lives but also on the wider community around them. This approach is defined as steward leadership.
The stewardship mindset is having the desire to create a collective better future for stakeholders, society, future generations and the environment encompassing the four values of long-term view, interdependence, ownership mentality and creative resilience alongside your own personal values.
By integrating a balanced approach to ethics through negative utilitarianism while embracing stewardship values, we build a comprehensive framework for net positivity.
Net positivity, at its core, revolves around creating win-win solutions through that uplift everyone involved. By prioritizing mutual benefit, we can create solutions that prevent harm while proactively doing good—shifting from merely minimizing negative outcomes to actively contributing to positive change. Ultimately, embracing a stewardship mindset to create a collective better future.
Of course, trying to be a net-positive individual isn’t an easy undertaking. Just like net positivity for businesses and organisations, it’s a complex challenge that cannot be done overnight. However, by focusing on your own positive and negative impact on the environment, your wider community and society as a whole, you can identify factors that lead to you having a negative impact instead of a neutral or positive one. Setting realistic and achievable goals to create positive change in your community can also help integrate net-positivity more deeply into your life.
Net-positivity, at the end of the day, is a choice which is built on ethics and activated by steward leadership. We should use our power responsibly to achieve the best possible outcomes for both ourselves and society.
Get full access to groundbreaking solutions. No cost, just a few seconds.
Chase Life Worth, Not Net Worth
Tolaram: Stewardship across generations
The sources of self-worth
Charting the course of stewardship: from philosophy to principles to practices
Want to leave a comment? Sign up or log in.
Be the first person to leave a comment!
Sign up or log in now.
Submit an idea, propose a course, or start a conversation that moves the field forward.